Focus

European journalism interesting practices and innovative legislations

Flagship proposals

Concrete political proposals in support of a civic and social European journalism. Come and comment them !

Op-Eds

Views on media and media policies. Do you agree with them?

In the news

Events to attend and news to share

In French

Articles et propositions en français

Home » Flagship proposals

Create a new employment statute for EU correspondents

Submitted by on November 14, 2011 – 12:372 Comments

Goal

For infor­ma­tion on Europe that is rooted in the regions, closer to people

Pro­posal

Cre­ate a new statute for Europe cor­re­spon­dents accord­ing to which the cor­re­spon­dents’ social secu­rity schemes and pay­roll charges will now depend on the law in the coun­try where their employ­ers head office is based, and not any­more on the correspondent’s coun­try of residence.

This statute would apply to all jour­nal­ists cov­er­ing the Euro­pean Union, in Brus­sels and Strasbourg.

Explana­tory statement

The num­ber of Europe cor­re­spon­dents is in free-fall. Today one can count barely 1,000 accred­ited jour­nal­ists, for 38,000 Euro­pean civil ser­vants and 15,000 lob­by­ists work­ing in Brussels.

Sev­eral fac­tors seem to explain, to vary­ing degrees, this dis­ap­pear­ance. The first would be the lack of ambi­tion and ini­tia­tive of the cur­rent Euro­pean Com­mis­sion pres­i­dency. The sec­ond, the avail­abil­ity on the Inter­net of all Euro­pean Com­mis­sion press con­fer­ences and Euro­pean Par­lia­ment debates. As such peo­ple often say that send­ing a jour­nal­ist to Brus­sels is point­less. But on the con­trary, being in Brus­sels or Stras­bourg is essen­tial to explor­ing Europe’s polit­i­cal machin­ery, in which cit­i­zens have a part to play, in order to carry out real inves­ti­ga­tion and analy­sis. Infor­ma­tion on Europe can­not be lim­ited to the “copy paste” of offi­cial press releases found on the Internet.

The key fac­tor in the lack of local and national Europe cor­re­spon­dents in news­rooms is the pro­hib­i­tive cost of Bel­gian pay­roll charges (which are, for exam­ple, three times higher than in Ger­many). Media organ­i­sa­tions that want to keep a Europe cor­re­spon­dent some­times have no other choice than an ille­gal one, which con­sists in declar­ing the correspondent’s res­i­dence and work­place as being in his coun­try of ori­gin, rather than in Belgium.

The Inter­na­tional Press Asso­ci­a­tion has been ask­ing for years for the cre­ation of a spe­cific employ­ment statute for Europe cor­re­spon­dents; it has become urgent to set this up.


Related posts:

  1. Why do they leave Brussels?
  2. How to recon­nect jour­nal­ists to Strasbourg?
  3. Cafeba­bel cel­e­brates 10 years of Euro­pean information
  4. Cre­ate a Euro­pean net­work for train­ing in Euro­pean journalism
  5. Should the cov­er­age of Euro­pean affairs become a part of pub­lic broad­cast­ers’ missions?


2 Comments »

  • Esther Durin says:

    There is a long-standing mobil­i­sa­tion for the cre­ation of a new statute for Euro­pean cor­re­spon­dents. But the main issues are to know by who and how it should be created.

    Apply­ing social secu­rity schemes and pay­roll charges of the coun­try of ori­gin is a pos­si­bil­ity. There may be alter­na­tives? Do you have any idea?

  • Esther Durin says:

    On Novem­ber 8 pre­sen­ta­tion, Marc Gru­ber alerted us on the fact that this statute would arrive too late, if we take into account that most Euro pean jour­nal­ists are today self-employed, and no longer wage earners.

    Fully right!

    But could this new statute and the sub­se­quent pay­roll charges reduc­tion, lead national and regional media to send again jour­nal­ists to Brussels?

    Fif­teen years ago, free­lance statute was more a choice. Today, it has become, for many jour­nal­ists, an imposed and inevitable way. To sur­vive with the cri­sis, media dras­ti­cally low­ered their expenses. Jour­nal­ists are the first vic­tims: reduced job secu­rity, flex­i­bil­ity, piece rate work… Fac­ing tes­ti­monies, this sit­u­a­tion tends to reduce journalists’s inde­pen­dance and freedom.

    From then on, a new employe­ment statute could lead to new hir­ing, with more secure work con­di­tions, for Brus­sels jour­nal­ists? Couldn’t it?

    What do you think?

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.