Focus

European journalism interesting practices and innovative legislations

Flagship proposals

Concrete political proposals in support of a civic and social European journalism. Come and comment them !

Op-Eds

Views on media and media policies. Do you agree with them?

In the news

Events to attend and news to share

In French

Articles et propositions en français

Home » Featured, Op-Eds

The future of European information and public broadcasters hand in hand

Submitted by on April 18, 2011 – 09:43No Comment

In the White paper we invite the EU to encour­age Mem­ber States to put Euro­pean infor­ma­tion in the pub­lic broad­cast­ers’ mis­sion. But how can this be done?

While the Euro­pean insti­tu­tions expressed many times their attach­ment to Pub­lic Broad­cast­ing, they also stressed each time their incom­pe­tency in this field.

The Treaty of Amsterdam’s Pro­to­col on the sys­tem of pub­lic broad­cast­ing in the Mem­ber States is very clear on this point : each Mem­ber state define, organ­ise and pro­vide for the fund­ing of the mis­sion of pub­lic broad­cast­ing.

The Euro­pean Union leg­isla­tive action on TV’s and radio’s con­tent actu­ally only con­sists of a restric­tive and cor­rec­tive approach, to pro­tect audi­ence groups such as con­sumers or minors.

Should this become a com­mon sight in pub­lic broad­cast­ers’ stu­dios? © Euro­pean Parliament — Flickr

The rest of the Euro­pean leg­is­la­tion on medias essen­tially con­cerns the loy­alty of com­mer­cial trans­ac­tions and the respect of the com­pe­ti­tion. It aims to develop a strong Euro­pean mar­ket able to face up to the Amer­i­can one. The Audio­vi­sual Media Ser­vice direc­tive adopted on 10 March 2010 is based on the same quota already set up in the Tele­vi­sion with­out fron­tiers Direc­tive of 1989. Thus, Mem­ber States shall ensure that broad­cast­ers reserve for Euro­pean pro­duc­tions a major pro­por­tion of their trans­mis­sion time and that they reserve for works of espe­cially inde­pen­dent Euro­pean pro­duc­ers at least 10% of their trans­mis­sion time or alter­nately, at least 10% of their pro­gram­ming budget.

The finan­cial Euro­pean Com­mis­sion Media Pro­gramme com­pletes this leg­is­la­tion by sup­port­ing move­ment of Euro­pean works.

If this move­ment can increase an inter­cul­tural under­stand­ing between dif­fer­ent regions of Europe, it’s all good. Although, at least three buts come to mind. First, the arti­cles 16 and 17 of the Audio­vi­sual Media Ser­vice Direc­tive add to the rule the for­mula so dear to Mem­ber States: “where prac­ti­cal”. But how do we define the unprac­ti­cal? In real­ity, there are a great vari­ety of situations.

Sec­ondly, the diver­si­fi­ca­tion of the ori­gin of the works can’t pre­judge a diver­si­fi­ca­tion of their con­tent. On the con­trary, we wit­ness a real phe­nom­e­non of homogeni­sa­tion of con­tents all over Europe.

Lastly, let’s no for­get the first moti­va­tion of this kind of leg­is­la­tion: to rein­force the Euro­pean audio­vi­sual mar­ket, con­sid­ered as an indus­try above all. If we don’t change this par­a­digm, the good inten­tions of the fifth “whereas” high­light­ing the cul­tural dimen­sion of media ser­vices, and admit­ting that “their grow­ing impor­tance for democ­racy […] edu­ca­tion and cul­ture jus­ti­fies the appli­ca­tion of spe­cific rules”, will be always passed under a steamroller.

Any­way, back to the point!

If the leg­isla­tive way is cur­rently closed, the Euro­pean Par­lia­ment has the pos­si­bil­ity to express a posi­tion in a non-legislative res­o­lu­tion. That’s what he recently did with the Res­o­lu­tion on pub­lic ser­vice broad­cast­ing in the dig­i­tal era: the future of the dual sys­tem (2010/2028(INI)), in which it sup­ported not only the pres­ence of pub­lic ser­vice media on the Web, but also invested them with the fight against numer­i­cal divide and other new tasks inher­ent to this media.

Indeed, the arrival of pub­lic broad­cast­ers on the dig­i­tal area makes nec­es­sary the redefin­ing of their mis­sions in each Mem­ber states. So it seems to be an appro­pri­ate moment to cam­paign for the intro­duc­tion of Euro­pean infor­ma­tion on their mission.

How would you rede­fine the future of pub­lic broad­cast­ers? Let us know in the com­ments below this post or on our forum. You must be logged in to reply. Click here to register.

Related posts:

  1. Inter­net is a part of pub­lic broad­cast­ers’ missions
  2. Should the cov­er­age of Euro­pean affairs become a part of pub­lic broad­cast­ers’ missions?
  3. Make infor­ma­tion on Europe an essen­tial part of pub­lic ser­vice information
  4. Pub­lic broad­cast­ers on the Web: for or against?
  5. Faire de l’information européenne une com­posante essen­tielle de l’information de ser­vice public


Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.